Mitchell Krueger vs Jason Jung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Krueger vs J. Jung
Mitchell Krueger
USA
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
4
Win
10
Played
6
Win
31
Age
36
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
205
C. Rank
856
135
Best Rank
114
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$350.6K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Jason Jung
TPE
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
4
Win
10
Played
6
Win
31
Age
36
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
205
C. Rank
856
135
Best Rank
114
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$350.6K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Krueger 4 - 6 Jung
They have played 23 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 9 and Jason Jung winning 14. The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Jason Jung was at the Little Rock Challenger, 04-06-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krueger | 4 |
| Jung | 6 |
Last 10 H2H Matches:
(QF) Little Rock Challenger(06-04-21)
Mitchell Krueger
3
6
6
Jason Jung
6
2
1
(Q3) New York Open - New York(02-10-20)
Jason Jung
6
6
Mitchell Krueger
2
4
(R2) Indian Wells Challenger(02-26-19)
Jason Jung
6
6
Mitchell Krueger
1
4
M. Krueger vs J. Jung H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,082,108 | Career Prize Money | $350,585 |
| 52.62% (452-407) | Career Total W/L | 55.35% (414-334) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 4 | Hard | 4 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 10 | Titles | 8 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 6 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Krueger vs J. Jung Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell Krueger has won 46.52% of points on their second serve, while Jason Jung has won 46.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell Krueger, in recent form, has won 45.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jason Jung has won 48.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.61% and 28.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mitchell Krueger has saved 58.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jason Jung has saved 52.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell Krueger has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/32), with Jason Jung winning 22.22% (W/L 2/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mitchell Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 124/97), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 10/18). Jason Jung has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 308/223), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/26).
- Player level: In the last year, Mitchell Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.26% of matches (W/L 21/17), where as Jason Jung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 10 times before with Mitchell Krueger winning 4 times and Jason Jung being victorious 6 times. They have played 23 sets in total, with Mitchell Krueger winning 9 and Jason Jung winning 14.
- The last match between Mitchell Krueger and Jason Jung was at the Little Rock Challenger, 04-06-2021, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mitchell Krueger and Jason Jung have played a deciding set 3 times, with Mitchell Krueger winning 2 times and Jason Jung 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Mitchell Krueger winning 2, and Jason Jung 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.51 while Jason Jung has played against players with an average rank of 330.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell Krueger has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jason Jung has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell Krueger has converted 30.20% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jason Jung has converted 41.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mitchell Krueger vs Jason Jung Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Krueger vs J. Jung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 6 |
| 9 | Sets Won | 14 |
| 93 | Games Won | 112 |
| 23 | Aces (Total) | 29 |
| 18 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 0:58:59 | Average Match Time | 0:58:59 |
| 64% (255/401) | 1st Serve % | 59% (253/429) |
| 62% (158/255) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (182/253) |
| 47% (69/146) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (99/176) |
| 37% (10/27) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (26/43) |
| 34% (148/429) | Return Points Win % | 43% (174/401) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (2/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 71% (5/7) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 29% (2/7) |
| 29% (2/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (1/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Krueger 50%, Jung 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Krueger 50%, Jung 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Krueger 61%, Jung 53%.
M. Krueger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025 | ||||
R1 Darwin BlanchD. Blanch | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
| Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
F Darwin BlanchD. Blanch | W | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-1 | ||
SF  Cedrik-Marcel StebeC. Stebe | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
QF  Inaki Montes-De La TorreI. Montes-De | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2  Antoine GhibaudoA. Ghibaudo | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
J. Jung Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kobe Challenger - 10-11-2025 | ||||
R1  Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka | L | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R2 Yoshihito NishiokaY. Nishioka | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 Arthur WeberA. Weber | W | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
| Suzhou Challenger - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R1  James McCabeJ. McCabe | L | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Shenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida | L | 6-3 2-0 ret. | ||
M. Krueger vs J. Jung Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.62% (452/407) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.35% (414/334) |
| 52.67% (1067/959) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.67% (949/787) |
| 51.10% (9910/9485) | Games Win/Loss | 51.99% (8605/7946) |
| 53.56% (278/241) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.00% (308/223) |
| 56.11% (124/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.21% (31/32) |
| 43.96% (40/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.93% (55/53) |
| 35.71% (10/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 3016 | Aces Total | 1949 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1732 | Total Double Faults | 1621 |
| 1:24:12 | Average Match Time | 1:12:48 |
| 534.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 565.62 |
| 62% (31103/50222) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25533/40298) |
| 69% (21515/31103) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17485/25533) |
| 51% (9698/19119) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7548/14765) |
| 41% (1884/4584) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1594/3943) |
| 38% (19471/50786) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16005/40933) |
| 46.03% (29/34) | Slam W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 48.00% (36/39) | Main Tour W/L | 46.25% (37/43) |
| 49.70% (248/251) | Challenger W/L | 53.93% (240/205) |
| 67.20% (127/62) | Futures W/L | 69.59% (119/52) |
| 52% (441/842) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (409/720) |
| 55% (6/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 9% (2/22) |
| 45% (134/295) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (122/241) |
| 45% (136/299) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (113/218) |
| 81% (459/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (416/352) |
| 19% (459/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (416/64) |
| 19% (400/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (331/61) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
A. Binda8
T. SamuelW1
3.34
W2
1.27
04:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
A. Donskiq
A. GuerrieriqW1
2.43
W2
1.48
11:35 AM 20/11/25
PredictionC. DongJ. LeatherqW1
1.84
W2
1.84
12:05 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
A. BojarskiA. Nagel5W1
3.74
W2
1.22
11:20 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
J. H. LithenqA. Chepelev2W1
2.98
W2
1.33
12:05 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
V. Ursu
M. Mrva7W1
2.76
W2
1.38
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Jaume Antoni Munar ClarJiri Lehecka14:00
H2H 0-2
Vadym UrsuMaxim Mrva12:05
H2H 0-0
Mateus AlvesGustavo Heide17:00
H2H 0-0
Gonzalo VillanuevaNicolas Kicker17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP-CZE
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal